Truly amazing to get the benefits of Roon and the SQ of JPLAY dual-pc. Now after reinstall of audio-pc Roon in WS2016 on Control-pc sees JPlay-driver. I did a reinstall of WS2016 on the Audio-pc and also reinstall of Fedora 28 with CCRMA-kernel to compare. However JPLAY dual-pc is far better than Fedora + Roonbridge. SQ between Femto and Roon running both on WS 2016 in my system is almost not perceivable to me.

So, Windows Server 2016 Core + AO 2.20 + Fidelizer 8.2 + JPLAY 7 Classic are installed on both of my computers (Control PC and Audio PC), now.I agree 100%. So, Windows Server 2016 Core + AO 2.20 + Fidelizer 8.2 + JPLAY 7 Classic are installed on both of my computers (Control PC and Audio PC), now. Perhaps it's a point we have to consider for the SQ improvement. Note that I can go further in the optimizations suggested by Marcin for my JCAT NET Card FEMTO on the control PC with Windows Server 2016 Core than with Fedora 28. The JPLAY 7 dual PC link is giving me better SQ than the Roonbridge link. The other thing is that Windows Server 2016 Core on the PC server works better now than fedora 28. I'm very interested by your comparison if you do it Johannes.įor my part, I've not made comparison between JplayFemto and Roon + JPLAY 7 as I'm using Xtalk convolution filters for Room correction (EQ, phase and crosstalk correction) and only Roon or JRiver Media center allow that but I must admit that SQ is great and has improved a lot with JPLAY 7 in combination with Roon.

I was planning to do a comparison between jplayfemto and Roon+Jplay 7.

Jriver media center tidal